I love to review and read about both evolution and creation. I believe they both have scientific qualities and both have the problem of being labeled as “absolute truth.”

Evolutionists have it somewhat backwards because their “scientific dialogue” suggests all of their findings on things we cannot observe, test, or repeat; like the origins of life or the universe. Therefore, it is entirely left up to a set of assumptions that says: Either there is a God who did all this, or there is not. Evolutionists have chosen that there is no God, and so all of their predictions concerning the past are based on un-provable assumptions.

Evidence does not speak for itself, and therefore must be interpreted. It’s like a homicide really; detectives have the “evidence” and proceed to make assumptions. The difference between detectives and evolutionists is detectives have people to investigate to find the truth and evolutionists must accept their un-provable conclusions solely by faith, until they find more evidence.

Interesting…. Evolutionists accept their “beliefs” by faith.

And then, there are the creationists.
A gentleman by the name of Mr. Ham has recently opened a creationism museum.

The point of the museum is to teach the “correct” way of thinking solely based on biblical teaching. So a book that was written WAY after the concept of words, letters and writing explains to us what occurred when God did it all. There is a verse in the bible that talks about a “large monster” and that has been interpriated as “the dinosaurs roamed with the people.”

Personally, the creation of the planet (the correct creation) means nothing to me. If Mr. Ham and his friends look down at their WWJD bracelet and decide that $27 million is best spent building this type of museum, that’s their choice. I would think there may be better uses that fall along the lines of the teachings of Jesus.
What I can’t understand is why these fundamental Christians feel a need to “prove” to those around them that their way of thinking is correct…isn’t the whole idea of “having faith” not needing proof?